Connecting Nepal through Internet

The Kingdom of Nepal is a landlocked country bordered by the People’s Republic of China to the north and by India to the south, east and west. Most of the people are uneducated in the present time also. It is shameful to say that not only people, the leader of the country are also uneducated.

We can see some members of constituent assembly who even do not know how to write their name. To use computer and internet is very difficult as to drink water for dog. This condition shows that what the condition of the internet users in Nepal is. The leaders are perfect to give speech and lure the people.

The Internet was first introduced into Nepal in 1993 in a venture of the Royal Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (RONAST) and a private company, Mercantile Office Systems (MOS). After the internet introduced in Nepal it was mostly used by the high class people.

Poor people were deprived of using. We can find low number of people who use internet for different purposes. Nepal is the country which has many undeveloped remote areas. These people who are in remote area are unknown about computer. They are even deprived of using electricity. Most of the county hasn’t access of electricity. Government is unable to give technical knowledge for the people.

Students form schools, and colleges are lose practically. They are taught theoretically more. Till now most governmental office also do not have access of computer and internet. According to the data of year 2007- 249,400 people use internet out of 25,874,519 people which was the total population of Nepal. The condition of internet before 1997 was very poor.

If we come to evaluate the present condition the number is growing day by day. But the number is growing in city area only. Remote areas are till deprived. There are such people who even don’t know the alphabet letters. Parents are sent to jungle for grass and wood for their livelihood. When these children who even do not know the alphabet letters will develop their skill to use computer and internet. This is the question over governments.

Parents are also unaware about the importance of education, computer, e-mail, and internet and also about the modern technology. Mostly internet users are the high class people, city dwellers, NGOs, Ingo’s, and the official men’s. There are numerous Internet cafes in Kathmandu, and other city areas of Nepal. Young people, in particular, are being drawn to the use of e-mail and the Internet.

The Internet is used by the vast majority of Nepalese for e-mail, chatting and, among younger users, downloading games and music. However, 88% of the population of Nepal lives in rural areas, and a great number of these areas has no electricity or phone connections. Thus only NGOs with centrally located offices have the potential to access the Internet.

When we estimate the present condition of the internet in Nepal it seems one most challenging issues of the country. Development without technology and education is impossible. So the government should be aware about the plight and give the technical and practical education not only in the city areas rather also in the rural areas of the country.

Government should also think that for the development first of all people should educated well and public awareness should be there in the nooks and corner of the country. People should not be deprived of education. So it is one of the most challenging issue.

Today's world is at the highest level of human development. Internet has become one of the cheapest, fastest and easiest effective means of communication. Nepal Government has also given some concern now a days. They are also talking bridging Nepal through Internet.

I have posted here how Korea bridged itself through Internet and lead U.S. in ranking for the faster and cheap internet connectivity. This story might help Nepal as well!

Broadband Internet speeds in the United States are only about one-fourth as fast as those in South Korea, the world leader, according to the Internet monitoring firm Akamai.

And, as if to add insult to injury, U.S. Internet connections are more expensive than those in South Korea, too.

The slower connection here in the U.S. costs about $45.50 per month on average, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In South Korea, the much-faster hookup costs $17 per month less. An average broadband bill there runs about $28.50.

So why is U.S. Internet so much slower and pricier than broadband connections in South Korea? The question is timely, as the U.S. government pushes forward with a "broadband plan" that aims to speed up connections, reduce costs and increase access to the Internet, especially in rural areas.

Map: U.S. Internet is slower than Slovakia's?

The comparison between South Korea and the United States is not perfectly instructive, especially since "we probably won't ever be South Korea," said Robert Faris, research director at Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.

"The whole political and social climate is so different, the geography is different, the history is so different," he said. "It's all pretty different."

With those caveats in mind, here are the five potential reasons U.S. Internet speeds are slower and more expensive than those in South Korea. This list was gleaned from interviews with broadband experts and from policy papers:

Culture and politics

There are stark cultural differences between hyper-connected Korea, where more than 94 percent of people have high-speed connections, according to the OECD, and the United States, where only about 65 percent of people are plugged into broadband, according to an FCC survey.

The South Korean government has encouraged its citizens to get computers and to hook up to high-speed Internet connections by subsidizing the price of connections for low-income and traditionally unconnected people.

One program, for example, hooked up housewives with broadband and taught them how to make use of the Web in their everyday lives.

Parents in Korea, who tend to place high value on education, see such connections as necessities for their children's educations, said Rob Atkinson, president of the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.

These cultural differences mean Korea has a more insatiable demand for fast Internet connections, he said. That demand, in turn, encourages telecommunications companies to provide those connections.

Faris, of the Berkman Center, said no one society has a stronger appetite for Internet connectivity than another. Korea's government simply has whetted that appetite, and provided the incentives to make high-speed connections accessible to a large segment of society.

Political culture has more to do with it, he said.

"The United States is a more litigious culture than others, and the power of the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to regulate is not as strong here as it is in other countries," which means its less likely that the U.S. will pass policies to promote the growth of ultra-fast broadband.

Open versus closed networks

There is vigorous debate in the telecommunications world about the role "open networks" have in creating fast, cheap Internet connections.

The idea behind an "open" system is essentially that, for a fee, broadband providers must share the cables that carry Internet signals into people's homes.

Companies that build those lines typically oppose this sharing. A number of governments, including South Korea and Japan and several European countries, have experimented with or embraced infrastructure-sharing as a way to get new companies to compete in the broadband market.

The U.S. does not require broadband providers to share their lines, and some experts cite Korea's relative openness as one reason the Internet there is so much faster and cheaper than it is here.

The most important thing is that countries create a way for companies to enter the broadband market without having to pay for huge amounts of infrastructure, said Faris.

Population density

South Korea, with more than 1,200 people per square mile, is a lot denser than the United States, where 88 people live in the same amount of space, and where rural areas and suburbs are large.

The result for broadband? It costs less to set up Internet infrastructure in a tightly populated place filled with high-rise-apartments, such as South Korea, than it does in the United States, where rural homes can be great distances apart.

In both countries, copper wires tend to carry broadband signals from fiber optic cables and into the home. Data can travel fast on copper wire, but it slows down the farther it goes.

In South Korea, that's usually just from the base of an apartment building to a particular unit. In the U.S., copper wire may have to link a home with a fiber optic cable that's a mile away.

Korea had a plan ... a decade ago

In the 1990s, South Korea set a priority that it would be a highly connected country with a high degree of Internet literacy.

"They made this a priority 10 years ago and they've really executed on it," said Atkinson, from ITIF, the Internet policy think tank.

The country is still four to five years ahead of the U.S. when it comes to broadband policy, even as the United States tries to catch up, said Taylor Reynolds, an economist at OECD.

"Korea has long been a leader in broadband and in very fast broadband," he said. "And, in fact, the technology that Korea has used for probably the past four to five years is VDSL, and that's a technology that's now being put in by AT&T" in the United States.

Meanwhile, Korea is abandoning that technology in favor of the next big thing, Reynolds said. That likely involves bringing super-fast fiber optic cables straight into homes. And, according to a recent report by the Berkman Center, that could make South Korean Internet 10 times faster than it is now.

Faris said Korea's clear-cut plan helped lead to its faster broadband speeds.

"A big difference is that Korea made a decisive move to expand Internet in the country," he said. "They said we want to be very good at connecting to the Internet. A lot of government money was thrown at it ...

"The U.S. has taken a fairly hands-off approach to the sector. They've left it to the private sector. There's been some money put into it, but not that much, on a per capita basis. We just haven't taken it that seriously."